22 May 2026
Settled, but for how long?

Settlement agreements are a common feature of English employment law, designed to bring workplace disputes to a clean and final conclusion.
They are legally binding contracts between an employer and an employee, usually involving the employee waiving potential legal claims in exchange for compensation or other agreed terms. While they can offer certainty, privacy, and efficiency for both sides, settlement agreements frequently go wrong when rushed, poorly drafted, or negotiated without sufficient care.
A settlement agreement is only valid if certain statutory requirements are met. The agreement must be in writing, relate to specific claims, and the employee must receive independent legal advice from a qualified adviser, usually a solicitor. The adviser must also be insured, and the agreement must identify both the adviser and the relevant legislation. These requirements are intended to protect employees from signing away important rights without understanding the consequences.
What could go wrong?
Despite these safeguards, problems regularly arise in practice. Indeed, in my experience, the majority of settlement agreements are not correctly drafted, or leave one or other party exposed to further claims or taxation. Employers sometimes use generic templates that fail to reflect the realities of the dispute or omit critical provisions. Ambiguous wording can create uncertainty over what claims are being settled. For example, if discrimination or whistleblowing claims are not properly identified, the employee may later argue that those claims survive the agreement. A settlement agreement intended to end litigation can therefore become the source of further legal proceedings.
Another major problem concerns pressure and timing. Employees are often presented with agreements during stressful circumstances such as redundancy exercises, disciplinary procedures, or workplace grievances. Some employers impose short deadlines or suggest that refusing to sign will result in dismissal without compensation. If an employee can show undue pressure or misrepresentation, the agreement may later be challenged. Even where the agreement remains enforceable, aggressive tactics can damage morale and reputation, particularly in senior departures or high-profile disputes.
Hazardous clauses
Tax treatment is another area where settlement agreements can go wrong. Payments linked to termination of employment may attract different tax consequences depending on how they are structured. Employers sometimes incorrectly label sums as tax-free compensation when they should be treated as taxable earnings, such as notice pay or bonuses. Mutual agreements can undermine the agreement, and errors can trigger disputes with HM Revenue & Customs, leaving parties exposed to unexpected liabilities and surprise deductions.
Confidentiality clauses also create difficulties. Many employers seek broad non-disclosure obligations to prevent discussion of workplace disputes. However, clauses that attempt to prevent whistleblowing, reporting criminal conduct, or discussing discrimination may be unenforceable. Regulatory scrutiny of overly restrictive confidentiality clauses has increased significantly in recent years, particularly following concerns about misuse in harassment cases.
Honouring the agreement
Practical failures can be equally damaging. Employers occasionally delay payments, fail to provide agreed references, or breach confidentiality themselves. Employees may discover that restrictive covenants continue to affect future employment opportunities in ways they did not fully appreciate when signing. Because settlement agreements are intended to achieve finality, breaches after signing can quickly undermine trust and provoke renewed disputes.
Ultimately, settlement agreements work best when both parties approach them carefully and transparently. Clear drafting, realistic negotiation, proper legal advice, and fair treatment are essential. When handled poorly, an agreement intended to resolve conflict can instead prolong it, increasing legal risk, financial cost, and reputational harm for everyone involved.
If you need advice from a legal expert, our lawyers are on hand to support you. Get in touch with Mark Broad here.












